How
fun it is to let my imagination run wild! Since I have the means and the knowledge to
do so, my research stems from a question about today’s foster care system.
Background
Information
Below
is an excerpt of the pilot program initiated in San Francisco in the light of reforming
the foster care system.
“Services
to be provided:
RBS
is a two-year experiment designed to determine whether better outcomes for
children and youth with complex emotional and behavioral needs and their
families can be obtained by integrating eight critical service components in
one comprehensive package: The 24 month pilot can begin anytime during the
Pilot Program time frame ending on January 31, 2016 and will vary per child
referred to the Pilot Program.
Behavioral
stabilization in a dedicated 6 bed family-centered residential treatment
cottage;
Immediate
and intensive family inclusion and support through the resources of a Family
Connection Center;
Overarching
care coordination through a family support team;
Evidence-supported
therapeutic services;
Opportunities
for interim community placements with parents, relative homes, or treatment or
regular foster care;
Parallel
community services while a child or youth is in the residential cottage to help
families and community partners prepare for the child or youth’s return;
Intensive
transitional care services, in-home treatment, and crisis stabilization and
services following discharge from the residential cottage.
The
following children and youth are eligible for the program:
Male
or female dependent children or youth ages 6 through 16 under the supervision
of HSA who are in an RCL level 12 or higher group home, and their families who
have behavioral needs that at present cannot be managed in the community using
wraparound or other intensive community-based services,
And
who have family members or other primary caregivers who are willing to work
with the program to help the child or youth achieve permanency, safety and
well-being,
But
for whom a sustainable permanency plan is unlikely to be accomplished within
the next 6 months unless intensive work is done to resolve difficulties in
attachment and to address challenges presented by the child or youth’s persistent
pattern of dangerous or disruptive behaviors” (Human Services Agency, City of
San Francisco, 2011).
Rationale:
Children
uplifted from their families of origin without being prepared and being
assessed, have a greater chance to not perform well in their first foster home,
move to another foster home, and often times end up having over 8 foster homes listed
on their cumulative file before landing in a group home specialized in intensive care treatment.
Children’s original trauma from home has now been multiplied by ten, or
exponentially multiplied due to the almost irreversible negative emotional
consequences that children develop from thinking they are bad kids because they
can’t remain in the families they have been placed in, and feeling guilty about not knowing how
to remain in a family. When they qualify for intensive care
treatment, several more years of abuse and mistrust have established deep roots.
Since
counties follow social science findings that children strive within their birth
family, counties’ only goal is to reunite foster children with their birth
families. Unfortunately, those birth families receive little help from the government.
Consequently, children are encouraged to visit with their families who are not
ready to welcome them in optimal conditions.
Rather
than spending money downstream, it would make more sense to dedicate that money
upstream, help the families keep their children from the start so foster care does
not become a need. Since huge amounts of money are spent on institutions who hire highly
specialized staff, the money invested in keeping those families together will
be better spent because the only trauma children will know comes from their
family of origin, much like everyone of us, each person on planet earth.
Hypothesis:
Children fare better when they remain
in their family of origin, provided those families receive all available services
that will help children stay in their original home.
Marie France,
ReplyDeleteYou chose a very interesting and fascinating topic that supports research that benefits children and families. I have never really put much thought into the benefits research has on children and families in the foster care system. You provided me with an eye opening outlook on the effects foster homes can have on children and families. Specifically, when relating the effects of being in a foster home, or multiple foster homes, to a child's behaviors in their school setting. It is important for educators to understand these effects and how to adapt within the classroom to better facilitate learning for the child!
Shawna
That topic was very interesting. I never looked at things that way but now I see how different things are. Everything is very open to me now and I am putting a lot of things into consideration just by reading your blog. Great job!!!!
ReplyDeleteThis was very a interesting read. What a great area to research. I would not have thought about it. I have a child in my class that is in the foster care system. It has really given me food for thought in what I might do to contribute to the child's experience.
ReplyDelete